Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... vs Bambussprossen
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ...
Bambussprossen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In S... | Bambussprossen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 12 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has 53% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.8 g).
- Bambussprossen has 38% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ...
55% pousse de bambou, eau, acide citrique.
Bambussprossen
55 % Bambussprossen, Wasser.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... or Bambussprossen?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 12 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.