Vita Weat 100% natural, original vs Vita-Weat 9 Grains
Overall, Vita Weat 100% natural, original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vita Weat 100% natural, orig... | Vita-Weat 9 Grains |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 411 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 14.4 g | 13.5 g |
| Protein | 11.7 g | 11.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vita Weat 100% natural, original has 20% less fat (7.4 g vs 9.2 g).
- Only Vita-Weat 9 Grains lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Vita Weat 100% natural, original
Céréale complète (91%), huile végétale, sel, sucre
Vita-Weat 9 Grains
CRISPBREAD WHOLEGRAINS (86%) (WHEAT, BARLEY, RYE, CORN), SEEDS (5%) (CANOLA, LINSEED, POPPY, SUNFLOWER KERNELS), VEGETABLE OIL, SALT, SUGAR, SOY. CONTAINS WHEAT, GLUTEN, SOY. MAY CONTAIN EGG, MILK, TREE NUTS, PEANUT, SESAME.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vita Weat 100% natural, original or Vita-Weat 9 Grains?
Overall, Vita Weat 100% natural, original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vita Weat 100% natural, original has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 411 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vita-Weat 9 Grains has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.