Soreen apple lunchbox loaf vs Vita-Weat 9 Grains
Overall, Vita-Weat 9 Grains has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soreen apple lunchbox loaf | Vita-Weat 9 Grains |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 411 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 19.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | — | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 13.5 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 11.8 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soreen apple lunchbox loaf has 22% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 411 kcal).
- Soreen apple lunchbox loaf has 64% less fat (3.3 g vs 9.2 g).
- Soreen apple lunchbox loaf has 47% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Vita-Weat 9 Grains has 91% less sugar (1.7 g vs 19.3 g).
- Vita-Weat 9 Grains has 75% more fiber (13.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Vita-Weat 9 Grains has 35% more protein (11.8 g vs 7.7 g).
- Vita-Weat 9 Grains is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Vita-Weat 9 Grains lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Soreen apple lunchbox loaf
Fortified wheat flour (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin (B3), thiamin (B1)), water, sugar, sweetened apple flavoured pieces (9%) (fructo-glucose syrup, concentrated apple puree, glucose syrup, glycerine, sugar, wheat fibre, palm fat, gelling agent: pectin, acidity regulator: citric acid, falouring, antioxidant: ascorbic acid), maize starch, apple puree (4%), vegetable fats (rapeseed, palm), malted barley flour, flavourings, salt, preservative: calcium propionate, yeast
Vita-Weat 9 Grains
CRISPBREAD WHOLEGRAINS (86%) (WHEAT, BARLEY, RYE, CORN), SEEDS (5%) (CANOLA, LINSEED, POPPY, SUNFLOWER KERNELS), VEGETABLE OIL, SALT, SUGAR, SOY. CONTAINS WHEAT, GLUTEN, SOY. MAY CONTAIN EGG, MILK, TREE NUTS, PEANUT, SESAME.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soreen apple lunchbox loaf or Vita-Weat 9 Grains?
Overall, Vita-Weat 9 Grains has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soreen apple lunchbox loaf has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 411 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vita-Weat 9 Grains has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 19.3 g per 100 g.