Comparison

Viande séchée de boeuf vs Viande des grisons -25% de sel

Overall, Viande des grisons -25% de sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientViande séchée de boeufViande des grisons -25% de s...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 192 kcal 188 kcal
Fat 4.4 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 1.5 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.5 g
Salt 4.4 g 3.7 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 37 g 38 g
Additives23
AllergensNutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Viande des grisons -25% de sel has 20% less fat (3.5 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Viande des grisons -25% de sel has 17% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Viande des grisons -25% de sel has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Viande des grisons -25% de sel has 16% less salt (3.7 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Only Viande séchée de boeuf lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Viande séchée de boeuf

Viande bovine (origine : France), sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, genièvre, romarin, cannelle, poivre, ail, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium et nitrate de potassium. traces éventuelles de fruits à coque, lait et oeufs.

Viande des grisons -25% de sel

Viande de bœuf origine U.E. ou hors U.E, sel, sel de mer (chlorure de magnésium, chlorure de potassium, chlorure de sodium), épices, extrait d'épice, dextrose, sucre, antioxydants: ascorbate de sodium, citrates de sodium, conservateur : nitrate de potassium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Viande séchée de boeuf or Viande des grisons -25% de sel?

Overall, Viande des grisons -25% de sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Viande des grisons -25% de sel has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 192 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Viande des grisons -25% de sel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons