Comparison

Viande des grisons -25% de sel vs Corned Beef

Overall, Corned Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientViande des grisons -25% de s...Corned Beef
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 188 kcal 225 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 13.6 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.2 g
Salt 3.7 g 1.2 g
Protein 38 g 25.3 g
Additives31
AllergensNone listedBeef

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Viande des grisons -25% de sel has 16% fewer calories (188 kcal vs 225 kcal).
  • Viande des grisons -25% de sel has 74% less fat (3.5 g vs 13.6 g).
  • Viande des grisons -25% de sel has 79% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 7 g).
  • Corned Beef has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Corned Beef has 66% less salt (1.2 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Viande des grisons -25% de sel has 33% more protein (38 g vs 25.3 g).
  • Corned Beef has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Corned Beef is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Corned Beef lists: Beef.

Ingredients

Viande des grisons -25% de sel

Viande de bœuf origine U.E. ou hors U.E, sel, sel de mer (chlorure de magnésium, chlorure de potassium, chlorure de sodium), épices, extrait d'épice, dextrose, sucre, antioxydants: ascorbate de sodium, citrates de sodium, conservateur : nitrate de potassium.

Corned Beef

Beef, Salt, Preservative (sodium nitrite). Prepared with 120g of beef per 100g of finished product

FAQ

Which is healthier: Viande des grisons -25% de sel or Corned Beef?

Overall, Corned Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Viande des grisons -25% de sel has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 225 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Corned Beef has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons