Comparison

Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner vs Hähnchenkebabpfanne

Overall, Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientViande hachée pur boeuf prêt...Hähnchenkebabpfanne
Nutri-Score — d
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 208 kcal 157 kcal
Fat 14 g 9 g
Saturated fat 5.7 g 3.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 20 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hähnchenkebabpfanne has 25% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • Hähnchenkebabpfanne has 36% less fat (9 g vs 14 g).
  • Hähnchenkebabpfanne has 39% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner has no sugar, while Hähnchenkebabpfanne has 0.5 g.
  • Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner has 15% more protein (20 g vs 17 g).
  • Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner

Pure viande bovine (origine : France)

Hähnchenkebabpfanne

96,7% flüssig gewürztes Hähnchenkeulenfleisch (97,21% Hähnchenkeulenfleisch, Wasser, Speisesalz), Kartoffelstärke, Gewürze, Kräuter, Dextrose, Karamellzuckersirup, Gewürzextrakte.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner or Hähnchenkebabpfanne?

Overall, Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hähnchenkebabpfanne has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Viande hachée pur boeuf prête à cuisiner has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons