VERMEIREN speculoos voltarwe vs CALVÉ pindakaas
Overall, CALVÉ pindakaas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | VERMEIREN speculoos voltarwe | CALVÉ pindakaas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 465 kcal | 669 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 59 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.4 g | 8.2 g |
| Sugars | 33 g | 5.9 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 4.2 g | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Peanuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- VERMEIREN speculoos voltarwe has 30% fewer calories (465 kcal vs 669 kcal).
- VERMEIREN speculoos voltarwe has 71% less fat (17 g vs 59 g).
- CALVÉ pindakaas has 82% less sugar (5.9 g vs 33 g).
- CALVÉ pindakaas has 38% more fiber (6.8 g vs 4.2 g).
- CALVÉ pindakaas has 68% more protein (21 g vs 6.7 g).
- CALVÉ pindakaas has the better Nutri-Score.
- CALVÉ pindakaas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only VERMEIREN speculoos voltarwe lists: Gluten.
- Only CALVÉ pindakaas lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
VERMEIREN speculoos voltarwe
Tarwebloem (38%), ruwe rietsuiker, plantaardige oliën en vetten (palm, koolzaad), tarwezemelen, honing (3,3%), sojabloem, inuline, rijsmiddel (natriumwaterstofcarbonaat), tarwevezels, kaneel, nootmuskaat.
CALVÉ pindakaas
PINDA 85%, plantaardige olie (raapzaad, soja, volledig geharde palm), zout,
FAQ
Which is healthier: VERMEIREN speculoos voltarwe or CALVÉ pindakaas?
Overall, CALVÉ pindakaas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
VERMEIREN speculoos voltarwe has fewer calories: 465 kcal versus 669 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
CALVÉ pindakaas has less sugar: 5.9 g versus 33 g per 100 g.