Comparison

Veloute asperges et comte vs Velouté d’asperges

Overall, Velouté d’asperges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVeloute asperges et comteVelouté d’asperges
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 37 kcal 27 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 0.6 g
Protein 1.5 g 0.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedCelery, Eggs, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Velouté d’asperges has 27% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 37 kcal).
  • Velouté d’asperges has no sugar, while Veloute asperges et comte has 0.5 g.
  • Veloute asperges et comte has 47% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Velouté d’asperges has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Velouté d’asperges lists: Celery, Eggs, Milk.

Ingredients

Veloute asperges et comte

Not available.

Velouté d’asperges

Water, knolselderij, 4,7% asperge, gegaarde ui, 3,8% kookroom (melk, room, zetmeel), rijstzetmeel, zeezout, gistextract, natuurlijke aroma's (bevat ei), 0,1% bieslook, witte peper, kurkuma. Kan sporen bevatten van glutenbevattende granen, soja. SOUPE INGRÉDIENTS: eau, céleri-rave, 4,7% asperge, oignon cuit, 3,8% crème de cuisson (lait, crème, amidon), amidon de riz, sel de mer, extrait de levure, arômes naturels (contient oeuf), 0,1% ciboulette, poivre blanc, curcuma. Peut contenir des traces de céréales contenant du gluten, soja. GEMIDDELDE

FAQ

Which is healthier: Veloute asperges et comte or Velouté d’asperges?

Overall, Velouté d’asperges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Velouté d’asperges has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Velouté d’asperges has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons