Comparison

Varkensgyrosreepjes vs Plantaardige shoarma

Overall, Plantaardige shoarma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVarkensgyrosreepjesPlantaardige shoarma
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 160 kcal 134 kcal
Fat 8.3 g 7.2 g
Saturated fat — 0.8 g
Sugars 0.2 g 0.4 g
Salt 1 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 4.9 g
Protein 20 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Plantaardige shoarma has 16% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 160 kcal).
  • Plantaardige shoarma has 13% less fat (7.2 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Varkensgyrosreepjes has 25% more protein (20 g vs 15 g).
  • Only Plantaardige shoarma lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Varkensgyrosreepjes

94% varkensvlees, zonnebloemolie, specerijen, zout, kruiden, natuurlijke aroma's, aardappelzetmeel, gistextract, citroensapconcentraat. Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.80g per 100 gram

Plantaardige shoarma

87% gehydrateerd plantaardig eiwit (water, 22% SOJA-EIWIT), plantaardige oliën (zonnebloem, raapzaad in wisselende verhoudingen), azijn, kruiden, specerijen, zout, natuurlijke aroma's, groenten (paprika, ui), water, knoflook, paprika concentraat, ijzer, vitamine B12

FAQ

Which is healthier: Varkensgyrosreepjes or Plantaardige shoarma?

Overall, Plantaardige shoarma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Plantaardige shoarma has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Varkensgyrosreepjes has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons