Comparison

Une specialité des Vosges vs Liechtensteiner würzig

Overall, Une specialité des Vosges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientUne specialité des VosgesLiechtensteiner würzig
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 183 kcal 412 kcal
Fat 8.6 g 33.5 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 20.4 g
Sugars 2.3 g 0 g
Salt 0.6 g 1.5 g
Fiber 1.4 g 0 g
Protein 8.2 g 27.2 g
Additives10
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Une specialité des Vosges has 56% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 412 kcal).
  • Une specialité des Vosges has 74% less fat (8.6 g vs 33.5 g).
  • Une specialité des Vosges has 95% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 20.4 g).
  • Liechtensteiner würzig has no sugar, while Une specialité des Vosges has 2.3 g.
  • Une specialité des Vosges has 61% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Une specialité des Vosges has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Liechtensteiner würzig has 70% more protein (27.2 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Une specialité des Vosges has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Liechtensteiner würzig is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Une specialité des Vosges

Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Sahne, Kâsereikulturen, Salz, Farbstoff: Annatto (in der Rinde); tierisches Lab.

Liechtensteiner würzig

Milch, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen, tierisches Lab, Rinde nicht zum Verzehr geeignet. Laktosefrei (Laktosegehalt < 0,1g/100g)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Une specialité des Vosges or Liechtensteiner würzig?

Overall, Une specialité des Vosges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Une specialité des Vosges has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 412 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Liechtensteiner würzig has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons