Uncured Beef Knockwurst vs Ćevapčići
Overall, Ćevapčići has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Uncured Beef Knockwurst | Ćevapčići |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 274 kcal | 243 kcal |
| Fat | 23.9 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.7 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 10 |
| Allergens | Beef, Celery | Gluten, Blé |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ćevapčići has 11% fewer calories (243 kcal vs 274 kcal).
- Ćevapčići has 25% less fat (18 g vs 23.9 g).
- Ćevapčići has 18% less saturated fat (8 g vs 9.7 g).
- Uncured Beef Knockwurst has no sugar, while Ćevapčići has 2.5 g.
- Ćevapčići has 12% more protein (15 g vs 13.3 g).
- Only Uncured Beef Knockwurst lists: Beef, Celery.
- Only Ćevapčići lists: Gluten, Blé.
Ingredients
Uncured Beef Knockwurst
BEEF, WATER, LESS THAN 1.5% OF SALT, CULTURED CELERY POWDER, NATURAL FLAVOR, PAPRIKA, SEA SALT. IN A PORK CASING.
Ćevapčići
Viande de bœuf 54%, graisse de bœuf, eau, chapelure (farine de blé, levure), sel de cuisine iodé, régulateur d'acidité: carbonate de sodium, acétate de sodium, stabilisants: diphosphate, triphosphate, acidifiant: glucono-delta-lactone, dextrose, exhausteur de goût: glutamate monosodique, antioxydants: acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, extrait d'épice.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Uncured Beef Knockwurst or Ćevapčići?
Overall, Ćevapčići has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ćevapčići has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 274 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Uncured Beef Knockwurst has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.