Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho vs Spelt biscuits
Overall, Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho | Spelt biscuits |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 374 kcal | 443 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 8.8 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 14 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has 16% fewer calories (374 kcal vs 443 kcal).
- Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has 80% less fat (2.6 g vs 13 g).
- Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has no saturated fat, while Spelt biscuits has 8.8 g.
- Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has 79% less sugar (3 g vs 14 g).
- Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has 67% more fiber (9.1 g vs 3 g).
- Spelt biscuits has 62% more protein (8.4 g vs 3.2 g).
- Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho
Farinha de milho¹ (93,5%), pó de cenoura¹ (3,9%), farinha de arroz¹ (2,6%), tiamina (Vitamina B1). ¹Ingrediente proveniente de agricultura biológica.
Spelt biscuits
Demeter pirina moka**(63%), rižev sirup*, demeter maslo**. banane v prahu, sredstvo za vzhajanje: natrijev hidrogenkarbonat, tiami (po zakonu)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho or Spelt biscuits?
Overall, Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has fewer calories: 374 kcal versus 443 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tubinhos de Cenoura e Milho has less sugar: 3 g versus 14 g per 100 g.