Comparison

Trufas clásicas al cacao vs Außer Baumstämme

Overall, Außer Baumstämme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrufas clásicas al cacaoAußer Baumstämme
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 620 kcal 528 kcal
Fat 46 g 29 g
Saturated fat 36 g 21 g
Sugars 41 g 54 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1 g —
Protein 4 g 3.2 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Außer Baumstämme has 15% fewer calories (528 kcal vs 620 kcal).
  • Außer Baumstämme has 37% less fat (29 g vs 46 g).
  • Außer Baumstämme has 42% less saturated fat (21 g vs 36 g).
  • Trufas clásicas al cacao has 24% less sugar (41 g vs 54 g).
  • Trufas clásicas al cacao has 20% more protein (4 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Only Trufas clásicas al cacao lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Trufas clásicas al cacao

Grasas vegetales (palma, palmiste, coco), azúcar, cacao desgrasado en polvo (14,8%), lactosuero en polvo, aroma de vainilla. Puede contener otros frutos de cáscara, cacahuete y soja.

Außer Baumstämme

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trufas clásicas al cacao or Außer Baumstämme?

Overall, Außer Baumstämme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Außer Baumstämme has fewer calories: 528 kcal versus 620 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trufas clásicas al cacao has less sugar: 41 g versus 54 g per 100 g.

More comparisons