Tricandilles vs Trippa al sugo
Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tricandilles | Trippa al sugo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 234 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trippa al sugo has 67% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 234 kcal).
- Trippa al sugo has 89% less fat (2.3 g vs 20 g).
- Trippa al sugo has 92% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 9.5 g).
- Tricandilles has no sugar, while Trippa al sugo has 1.6 g.
- Trippa al sugo has 56% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Trippa al sugo has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Tricandilles has 23% more protein (13 g vs 10 g).
- Trippa al sugo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tricandilles
Chaudins de porc origine Espagne, conservateur E250, vinaigre, persil.
Trippa al sugo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tricandilles or Trippa al sugo?
Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trippa al sugo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 234 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tricandilles has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.