Comparison

Tricandilles vs Trippa al sugo

Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTricandillesTrippa al sugo
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 234 kcal 77 kcal
Fat 20 g 2.3 g
Saturated fat 9.5 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0 g 1.6 g
Salt 2.5 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 1 g
Protein 13 g 10 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trippa al sugo has 67% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 234 kcal).
  • Trippa al sugo has 89% less fat (2.3 g vs 20 g).
  • Trippa al sugo has 92% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 9.5 g).
  • Tricandilles has no sugar, while Trippa al sugo has 1.6 g.
  • Trippa al sugo has 56% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Trippa al sugo has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
  • Tricandilles has 23% more protein (13 g vs 10 g).
  • Trippa al sugo has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tricandilles

Chaudins de porc origine Espagne, conservateur E250, vinaigre, persil.

Trippa al sugo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tricandilles or Trippa al sugo?

Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Trippa al sugo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 234 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tricandilles has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons