Comparison
Trauben hell vs Apfelmus
Overall, Apfelmus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Trauben hell | Apfelmus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 13.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apfelmus has 65% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 181 kcal).
- Apfelmus has 98% less fat (0.2 g vs 12 g).
- Apfelmus has no saturated fat, while Trauben hell has 4.6 g.
- Trauben hell has 96% less sugar (0.5 g vs 13.5 g).
- Apfelmus has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2 g).
- Trauben hell has 98% more protein (17 g vs 0.3 g).
- Apfelmus has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Trauben hell
Weintraube
Apfelmus
Äpfel (96,8%), Zucker (2,9%), Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Antioxidationsmittel (Ascorbinsäure).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trauben hell or Apfelmus?
Overall, Apfelmus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apfelmus has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trauben hell has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 13.5 g per 100 g.