Trauben hell vs Néctar de piña
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Trauben hell | Néctar de piña |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 32 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 7.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Néctar de piña has 82% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 181 kcal).
- Néctar de piña has no fat, while Trauben hell has 12 g.
- Néctar de piña has no saturated fat, while Trauben hell has 4.6 g.
- Trauben hell has 93% less sugar (0.5 g vs 7.5 g).
- Néctar de piña has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2 g).
- Trauben hell has 97% more protein (17 g vs 0.5 g).
- Trauben hell has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Néctar de piña lists: None.
Ingredients
Trauben hell
Weintraube
Néctar de piña
Zumo de piña a partir de concentrado, agua, azúcar líquido, acidulante: ácido cítrico, antioxidante: ácido ascórbico, edulcorantes: acesulfamo K y sucralosa.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trauben hell or Néctar de piña?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Néctar de piña has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trauben hell has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.