Comparison

Tranche de gigot vs Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy

Overall, Tranche de gigot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTranche de gigotSlow Cooked Lamb shank In Mi...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 128 kcal 218 kcal
Fat 6.2 g 11.5 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 4.8 g
Sugars 0 g 1.8 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.6 g
Fiber — 0.6 g
Protein 17.8 g 26.4 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tranche de gigot has 41% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 218 kcal).
  • Tranche de gigot has 46% less fat (6.2 g vs 11.5 g).
  • Tranche de gigot has 48% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Tranche de gigot has no sugar, while Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy has 1.8 g.
  • Tranche de gigot has 69% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy has 33% more protein (26.4 g vs 17.8 g).
  • Tranche de gigot has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tranche de gigot is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Tranche de gigot

Agneau

Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy

lamb shank (80%), water, onion, sugar, spirit vinegar, cornflour, herbs (mint, parsley, thyme), tomato purée, caramelised sugar syrup, garlic purée, salt, carrot juice, lamb extract, lamb meat powder, lamb fat, preservative (potassium sorbate), dried onion, flavouring, antioxidant (rosemary extract)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tranche de gigot or Slow Cooked Lamb shank In Mint Gravy?

Overall, Tranche de gigot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tranche de gigot has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 218 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tranche de gigot has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons