Ton veggie à la tomate vs Tonno in olio di oliva
Overall, Tonno in olio di oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ton veggie à la tomate | Tonno in olio di oliva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 11.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 25.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ton veggie à la tomate has 16% fewer calories (169 kcal vs 202 kcal).
- Tonno in olio di oliva has 21% less fat (11.1 g vs 14 g).
- Tonno in olio di oliva has 17% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Tonno in olio di oliva has no sugar, while Ton veggie à la tomate has 2.1 g.
- Ton veggie à la tomate has 38% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Ton veggie à la tomate has 100% more fiber (3.5 g vs 0 g).
- Tonno in olio di oliva has 80% more protein (25.5 g vs 5.1 g).
- Only Tonno in olio di oliva lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Ton veggie à la tomate
Fruit du jacquier* 25%, Protéines de féverole rehydratées*, Eau*, Huile d'olive*, Tomates* 12% (purée concentrée), Jus de citron*, Olives noires*, Wakamé*, Oignons*, Sel, Ail*, Levure alimentaire*, Herbes de Provence*
Tonno in olio di oliva
Tonno (70%), olio di oliva (29%), sale marino siciliano.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ton veggie à la tomate or Tonno in olio di oliva?
Overall, Tonno in olio di oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ton veggie à la tomate has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 202 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tonno in olio di oliva has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.