Comparison

Tomato and chilli chutney vs Tomato chutney

Overall, Tomato chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomato and chilli chutneyTomato chutney
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 190 kcal 135 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 44.4 g 28.1 g
Salt 1.7 g 0.8 g
Fiber 1.2 g 1 g
Protein 1.7 g 1.1 g
Additives12
AllergensMustardCelery, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomato chutney has 29% fewer calories (135 kcal vs 190 kcal).
  • Tomato chutney has 37% less sugar (28.1 g vs 44.4 g).
  • Tomato chutney has 52% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Tomato and chilli chutney has 35% more protein (1.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Tomato chutney has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tomato and chilli chutney is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tomato chutney lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Tomato and chilli chutney

Sugar, Water, Tomato (14%), Red Wine Vinegar, Bramley Apple, Tomato Paste (7%), Bramley Apple Purée, Dried Onion, Garlic Purée, Salt, Mustard Seeds, Habanero Chilli (0.4%), Salt, Acidity Regulator: Acetic Acid, Dried Chillies

Tomato chutney

Sugar, Water, Onion, Chopped Tomato (15%). Spirit Vinegar, Tomato Paste (7%), Red Pepper, Cornflour, Carrot, Gherkin [Gherkin, Water, Preservative (Acetic Acid), Salt, Firming Agent (Calcium Chloride)], Salt, Mustard Seeds, Paprika, Cayenne Pepper, Celery Powder. Allergy Advice

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomato and chilli chutney or Tomato chutney?

Overall, Tomato chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomato chutney has fewer calories: 135 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tomato chutney has less sugar: 28.1 g versus 44.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons