Tomates cerises entières au jus vs Carciofini interi
Overall, Tomates cerises entières au jus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomates cerises entières au... | Carciofini interi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 7.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomates cerises entières au jus has 67% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 93 kcal).
- Tomates cerises entières au jus has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 7.9 g).
- Tomates cerises entières au jus has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Carciofini interi has 79% less sugar (0.7 g vs 3.4 g).
- Tomates cerises entières au jus has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- Carciofini interi has 73% more fiber (5.2 g vs 1.4 g).
- Carciofini interi has 36% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.4 g).
- Tomates cerises entières au jus has the better Nutri-Score.
- Tomates cerises entières au jus is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Tomates cerises entières au jus
Tomates cerises 60%, jus de tomate, correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique
Carciofini interi
Carciofini 55%, olio di semi di girasole, aceto di vino, sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomates cerises entières au jus or Carciofini interi?
Overall, Tomates cerises entières au jus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomates cerises entières au jus has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Carciofini interi has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.