Thon en tranches albacore vs Thon entier au naturel
Overall, Thon entier au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thon en tranches albacore | Thon entier au naturel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 27.1 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Thon entier au naturel has 13% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Thon entier au naturel has 44% less fat (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Thon en tranches albacore has no salt, while Thon entier au naturel has 1 g.
Ingredients
Thon en tranches albacore
Thon albacore (poissons), eau, sel.
Thon entier au naturel
_Thon_, eau, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thon en tranches albacore or Thon entier au naturel?
Overall, Thon entier au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thon entier au naturel has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thon en tranches albacore has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.