Comparison

Thin & crispy Pizza bases vs Masa para pizza

Overall, Thin & crispy Pizza bases has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThin & crispy Pizza basesMasa para pizza
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 247 kcal 268 kcal
Fat 1 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 4.3 g 2.6 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.4 g
Fiber 3 g 1.3 g
Protein 7.6 g 8.2 g
Additives04
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Thin & crispy Pizza bases has 58% less fat (1 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Masa para pizza has 40% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Thin & crispy Pizza bases has 44% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Thin & crispy Pizza bases has 57% more fiber (3 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Thin & crispy Pizza bases is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Thin & crispy Pizza bases

wheat flour (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), water, durum wheat semolina, salt, yeast, dried wholemeal spelt wheat sourdough, extra virgin olive oil, allergy advice for allergens, including cereals containing gluten, see ingredients in bold, may also contain milk and soya, lidl typical values energy fat

Masa para pizza

wheat flour, water, wheat gluten, ethyl alcohol, raising agents (glucono-delta-lactone, potassium carbonates, diphosphates), 1,7% olive oil, salt, dextrose, yeast, flour treatment agent (ascorbic acid),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thin & crispy Pizza bases or Masa para pizza?

Overall, Thin & crispy Pizza bases has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Thin & crispy Pizza bases has fewer calories: 247 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Masa para pizza has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons