Masa para pizza vs Woodford Pizza Base
Overall, Woodford Pizza Base has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Masa para pizza | Woodford Pizza Base |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 10.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Woodford Pizza Base has no salt, while Masa para pizza has 1.4 g.
- Woodford Pizza Base has 61% more fiber (3.3 g vs 1.3 g).
- Woodford Pizza Base has 23% more protein (10.6 g vs 8.2 g).
- Woodford Pizza Base has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Masa para pizza
wheat flour, water, wheat gluten, ethyl alcohol, raising agents (glucono-delta-lactone, potassium carbonates, diphosphates), 1,7% olive oil, salt, dextrose, yeast, flour treatment agent (ascorbic acid),
Woodford Pizza Base
Woodfired Sourdough Pizza Base (Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin], Water, 8% Tomato Sauce (Tomatoes, Salt, Sunflower Oil, Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid; Dried Herbs, Dried Garlic), Durum Wheat Semolina, Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Salt, Wheat Gluten, Yeast, Wheat Starch, Malted Wheat Flour, Enzymes (Wheat), Flour Treatment Agent: Ascorbic Acid; Potato Starch, Sunflower Oil).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Masa para pizza or Woodford Pizza Base?
Overall, Woodford Pizza Base has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Woodford Pizza Base has fewer calories: 257 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Masa para pizza has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.