Thick Sliced Pepperoni vs M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni
Overall, M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Thick Sliced Pepperoni
M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thick Sliced Pepperoni | M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 464 kcal | 437 kcal |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 37.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 24.3 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef, Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has 19% less fat (37.8 g vs 46.4 g).
- M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has 16% less saturated fat (15 g vs 17.9 g).
- M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has 97% less sugar (0.1 g vs 3.6 g).
- M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has 27% less salt (3.3 g vs 4.6 g).
- M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has 12% more protein (24.3 g vs 21.4 g).
- Only Thick Sliced Pepperoni lists: Beef, Pork.
Ingredients
Thick Sliced Pepperoni
pork, beef, salt, contains 2% or less of: dextrose, natural flavors extractives of paprika, lactic acid starter culture, dehydrated granulated garli sodium nitrite, bha, bht, citric acid
M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thick Sliced Pepperoni or M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni?
Overall, M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has fewer calories: 437 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
M&S Italian Sliced Pepperoni has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.