Comparison
The snack pack mix vs Deka sporia Maura analata
Overall, Deka sporia Maura analata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | The snack pack mix | Deka sporia Maura analata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 447 kcal | 606 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 51.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 29 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 8.6 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 20.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- The snack pack mix has 26% fewer calories (447 kcal vs 606 kcal).
- The snack pack mix has 55% less fat (23 g vs 51.2 g).
- The snack pack mix has 45% less saturated fat (3 g vs 5.5 g).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has 91% less sugar (2.7 g vs 29 g).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has 30% more fiber (8.6 g vs 6 g).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has 47% more protein (20.6 g vs 11 g).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
The snack pack mix
Αμύγδαλα ομά 25% σταφίδα 25% casius ψημένα 25% τα αμάσκηνα 25%
Deka sporia Maura analata
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: The snack pack mix or Deka sporia Maura analata?
Overall, Deka sporia Maura analata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
The snack pack mix has fewer calories: 447 kcal versus 606 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Deka sporia Maura analata has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 29 g per 100 g.