Comparison
Deka sporia Maura analata vs Nuci de Macadamia crude
Overall, Deka sporia Maura analata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Deka sporia Maura analata | Nuci de Macadamia crude |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 606 kcal | 783 kcal |
| Fat | 51.2 g | 76 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.6 g | — |
| Protein | 20.6 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Deka sporia Maura analata has 23% fewer calories (606 kcal vs 783 kcal).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has 33% less fat (51.2 g vs 76 g).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has 54% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 12 g).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has 34% less sugar (2.7 g vs 4.1 g).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has 62% more protein (20.6 g vs 7.8 g).
- Deka sporia Maura analata has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Deka sporia Maura analata
Not available.
Nuci de Macadamia crude
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Deka sporia Maura analata or Nuci de Macadamia crude?
Overall, Deka sporia Maura analata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Deka sporia Maura analata has fewer calories: 606 kcal versus 783 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Deka sporia Maura analata has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.