Terrine saumon vs Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé
Overall, Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Terrine saumon | Terrine au Saumon et saumon... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 9.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Fish, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé has 19% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 197 kcal).
- Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé has 29% less fat (12 g vs 17 g).
- Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé has 38% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé has 15% less sugar (2.3 g vs 2.7 g).
- Terrine saumon has 28% more protein (13 g vs 9.3 g).
- Only Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé lists: Eggs, Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Terrine saumon
Not available.
Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé
_Saumon_ 37%, eau, _saumon_ fumé 8,5%, courgettes, _crème_ fraiche, huile de colza, blanc d'_oeuf_, double concentré de tomates, dextrose, tapioca, fécule de pomme de terre, épaississant : carraghénanes, sel, échalotes, jus concentré de carottes, wakamé, purée de yuzu, poivre, ciboulette
FAQ
Which is healthier: Terrine saumon or Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé?
Overall, Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 197 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terrine au Saumon et saumon fumé has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.