Comparison

Terrine de saumon et fondue de poireaux vs Terrine aux deux saumons

Overall, Terrine aux deux saumons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine de saumon et fondue...Terrine aux deux saumons
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 225 kcal 246 kcal
Fat 17 g 20 g
Saturated fat 5.3 g 2.3 g
Sugars 1.7 g 0 g
Salt 1.1 g 1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 12 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terrine de saumon et fondue de poireaux has 15% less fat (17 g vs 20 g).
  • Terrine aux deux saumons has 57% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Terrine aux deux saumons has no sugar, while Terrine de saumon et fondue de poireaux has 1.7 g.
  • Terrine aux deux saumons has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Terrine aux deux saumons lists: Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Terrine de saumon et fondue de poireaux

Not available.

Terrine aux deux saumons

Saumon Atlantique (Salmo salar) ASC 48% - eau - saumon fumé ASC 10,2% (saumon Atlantique Salmo salar ASC 10,1%, sel) - huile de colza - fromage blanc - épinards 2% - poireaux 1,9% - double concentré de tomates - blanc d'œuf en poudre - farine de blé - protéines de lait - sel aneth 0,25%. Traces de céleri, mollusques, crustacés, fruits à coque, graines de sésame, moutarde, sulfites, soja.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine de saumon et fondue de poireaux or Terrine aux deux saumons?

Overall, Terrine aux deux saumons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terrine de saumon et fondue de poireaux has fewer calories: 225 kcal versus 246 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine aux deux saumons has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons