Tandoori vs Tandoori
Overall, Tandoori has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tandoori | Tandoori |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 80 kcal | 120 kcal |
| Fat | 4.2 g | 5.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 5.3 g | 11.3 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Celery, Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tandoori has 33% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 120 kcal).
- Tandoori has 28% less fat (4.2 g vs 5.8 g).
- Tandoori has 53% less sugar (5.3 g vs 11.3 g).
- Tandoori has 45% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Only Tandoori lists: Celery, Eggs.
Ingredients
Tandoori
Purée de tomates* 52%, oignons*, eau, poivrons rouges, huile de colza*, amidons*, crème* (lait), farine de riz, épices 1,4% (gingembre*, cumin*, graines de coriandre*, paprika*, fenugrec* curcuma, cardamome*, cannelle*, piment*), sucre de canne*, jus de citron* à base de concentré, vinaigre de vin blanc*, sel marin, ail*, sel fumé (sel marin, fumée), épaississant: gomme guar*, feuilles de laurier*. ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Tandoori
concentrated tomato paste 10%,yogurt (thickener e440, lactic acid), sugar, rapeseed oil, modified corn starch, glucose syrup, fructose syrup, salt, spices (contains celery), parsley, chicken egg yolk, yeast extract, xanthan gum, acid: citric acid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tandoori or Tandoori?
Overall, Tandoori has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tandoori has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 120 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tandoori has less sugar: 5.3 g versus 11.3 g per 100 g.