Comparison

Taboulé à la menthé, boite de 730g vs Taboulé aux tomates fraîches

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTaboulé à la menthé, boite d...Taboulé aux tomates fraîches
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 123 kcal 116 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.3 g
Sugars 3 g 3.1 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.9 g
Fiber 2 g 2.1 g
Protein 4.4 g 4.1 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Taboulé aux tomates fraîches has 17% less fat (1.9 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Taboulé à la menthé, boite de 730g has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Taboulé aux tomates fraîches is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Taboulé à la menthé, boite de 730g

Garniture ( 550g) : tomate 60 % *, eau, oignon, poivron vert, huile d olive vierge 2.6 % *, menthe 1.5%, jus de citron concentré, sel, persil, arôme naturel de poivre. Sachet de semoule (180g) : semoule de BLE dur précuite à la vapeur. * pourcentages exprimés sur la boîte de garniture

Taboulé aux tomates fraîches

_1 boîte de garniture (550 g) :_ Tomates fraîches 42%, eau, oignons 4,8%, double concentré de tomates, poivrons rouges 2%, huile d'olive vierge 1,8%, feuilles de menthe hachées 1,6%, sel, persil, jus de citron concentré, poivre blanc moulu. _1 sachet de semoule (180 g) :_ semoule de _blé_ dur précuite 24,6%. Pourcentages exprimés sur le poids net total.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Taboulé à la menthé, boite de 730g or Taboulé aux tomates fraîches?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Taboulé aux tomates fraîches has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Taboulé à la menthé, boite de 730g has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons