Sweet piccalilli vs Piccalilly Trafasi
Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet piccalilli | Piccalilly Trafasi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 11.1 g | 14.2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Mustard | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sweet piccalilli has 29% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 95 kcal).
- Sweet piccalilli has 64% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Sweet piccalilli has 22% less sugar (11.1 g vs 14.2 g).
- Sweet piccalilli has 20% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Sweet piccalilli has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sweet piccalilli
Vegetables In Varying Proportions (38%) [Cauliflower, Gherkin, Onion, Silverskin Onion], Water, Spirit Vinegar, Sugar, Thickener (Acetylated Distarch Adipate), Mustard Flour, Rice Flour, Salt, Spices, Colour (Riboflavin), Rapeseed Oil, Flavouring, Cinnamon Extract
Piccalilly Trafasi
Water, augurken, suiker, MOSTERD (MOSTERD - zaad, natuurazijn, specerijen), Madam Jeanette peper (10%), kruiden en specerijen. gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, bloemkool, zilverulen, natuurazijn, wortelen, zout. zonnebloemolie, voedingszuur: azijnzuur. •
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet piccalilli or Piccalilly Trafasi?
Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sweet piccalilli has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sweet piccalilli has less sugar: 11.1 g versus 14.2 g per 100 g.