Super cacao vs Tiger
Overall, Super cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Super cacao | Tiger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 4.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 23.3 g | 14 g |
| Protein | 21.7 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tiger has 47% less fat (4.4 g vs 8.3 g).
- Tiger has 44% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 5 g).
- Super cacao has no sugar, while Tiger has 57 g.
- Super cacao has 40% more fiber (23.3 g vs 14 g).
- Super cacao has 49% more protein (21.7 g vs 11 g).
- Only Super cacao lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Super cacao
Poudre de fèves de cacao*. Extrait de corps fructifère de Lionis Mane*, Extrait de corps fructifère de Chaga". Extrait de mycélium de Cordyceps. Orge torréfiée. Extrait sec de Neurs de Mauve*. Malt d'Orge*, Extrait de racine de Ginseng' . Seigle" torréfié
Tiger
sucre de canne complet 60%, cacao fortement dégraissé 40%, vanille Bourbon. 100% issu de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Super cacao or Tiger?
Overall, Super cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Super cacao has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Super cacao has less sugar: 0 g versus 57 g per 100 g.