Sultaninen vs Bio Sauerkirschen
Overall, Bio Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sultaninen | Bio Sauerkirschen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 318 kcal | 309 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 69 g | 37 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Fiber | — | 6.3 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sultaninen has 91% less fat (0.6 g vs 7 g).
- Bio Sauerkirschen has 46% less sugar (37 g vs 69 g).
- Bio Sauerkirschen has 32% more protein (3.7 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Sultaninen
O O Sultaninen : Sultaninen, Baumwollsaatöl. Unter Schutzatmosphäre verpackt. Vor Wärme und Feuchtigkeit geschützt auft Mindestens haltbar bis Ende: siehe unten. OO Raisins secs sultanines Ingrédients: raisins sultanines séchés, hui Sondit orotectrice.
Bio Sauerkirschen
Bio Sauerkirschen, entsteint, sonnengetrocknet, geölt : Sauerkirschen", Sonnenblumenöl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sultaninen or Bio Sauerkirschen?
Overall, Bio Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Sauerkirschen has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Sauerkirschen has less sugar: 37 g versus 69 g per 100 g.