Comparison

Apfelchips vs Bio Sauerkirschen

Overall, Bio Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientApfelchipsBio Sauerkirschen
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group — 3
Calories 349 kcal 309 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 7 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 67 g 37 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 15 g 6.3 g
Protein 2.7 g 3.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Sauerkirschen has 11% fewer calories (309 kcal vs 349 kcal).
  • Apfelchips has 89% less fat (0.8 g vs 7 g).
  • Bio Sauerkirschen has 45% less sugar (37 g vs 67 g).
  • Apfelchips has 58% more fiber (15 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Bio Sauerkirschen has 27% more protein (3.7 g vs 2.7 g).

Ingredients

Apfelchips

Bio Apfelchips, getrocknet : Apfel. "aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten und Erdnüssen enthalten.

Bio Sauerkirschen

Bio Sauerkirschen, entsteint, sonnengetrocknet, geölt : Sauerkirschen", Sonnenblumenöl

FAQ

Which is healthier: Apfelchips or Bio Sauerkirschen?

Overall, Bio Sauerkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Sauerkirschen has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Sauerkirschen has less sugar: 37 g versus 67 g per 100 g.

More comparisons