Comparison

Sugo cacio e pepe vs Sugo cacio e pepe

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSugo cacio e pepeSugo cacio e pepe
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — —
Calories 180 kcal 189 kcal
Fat 16 g 15 g
Saturated fat 10.4 g 9.1 g
Sugars 2 g 0 g
Salt 1.8 g 3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 6 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 13% less saturated fat (9.1 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has no sugar, while Sugo cacio e pepe has 2 g.
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 42% less salt (1.8 g vs 3 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 45% more protein (11 g vs 6 g).

Ingredients

Sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

Sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sugo cacio e pepe or Sugo cacio e pepe?

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons