Sugo cacio e pepe vs Sugo cacio e pepe
Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugo cacio e pepe | Sugo cacio e pepe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 15.3 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 9.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 40% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 9.1 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 40% less salt (1.8 g vs 3 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 51% more protein (11 g vs 5.4 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sugo cacio e pepe
Not available.
Sugo cacio e pepe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugo cacio e pepe or Sugo cacio e pepe?
Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.