Comparison

Sugo cacio e pepe vs Gran sugo cacio e pepe

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSugo cacio e pepeGran sugo cacio e pepe
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 172 kcal 217 kcal
Fat 15.3 g 20 g
Saturated fat 5.5 g 14 g
Sugars 0 g 1 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.3 g
Fiber — 0.2 g
Protein 5.4 g 5.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 21% fewer calories (172 kcal vs 217 kcal).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 23% less fat (15.3 g vs 20 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 61% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 14 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has no sugar, while Gran sugo cacio e pepe has 1 g.
  • Gran sugo cacio e pepe has 28% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).

Ingredients

Sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

Gran sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sugo cacio e pepe or Gran sugo cacio e pepe?

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 217 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons