Gran sugo cacio e pepe vs Sugo cacio e pepe
Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gran sugo cacio e pepe | Sugo cacio e pepe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 217 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 9.1 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 13% fewer calories (189 kcal vs 217 kcal).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 25% less fat (15 g vs 20 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 35% less saturated fat (9.1 g vs 14 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has no sugar, while Gran sugo cacio e pepe has 1 g.
- Gran sugo cacio e pepe has 57% less salt (1.3 g vs 3 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 47% more protein (11 g vs 5.8 g).
- Gran sugo cacio e pepe has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Gran sugo cacio e pepe
Not available.
Sugo cacio e pepe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gran sugo cacio e pepe or Sugo cacio e pepe?
Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 217 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.