Comparison

Gran sugo cacio e pepe vs Sugo cacio e pepe

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGran sugo cacio e pepeSugo cacio e pepe
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — —
Calories 217 kcal 189 kcal
Fat 20 g 15 g
Saturated fat 14 g 9.1 g
Sugars 1 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 3 g
Fiber 0.2 g —
Protein 5.8 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 13% fewer calories (189 kcal vs 217 kcal).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 25% less fat (15 g vs 20 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 35% less saturated fat (9.1 g vs 14 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has no sugar, while Gran sugo cacio e pepe has 1 g.
  • Gran sugo cacio e pepe has 57% less salt (1.3 g vs 3 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 47% more protein (11 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Gran sugo cacio e pepe has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Gran sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

Sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gran sugo cacio e pepe or Sugo cacio e pepe?

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 217 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons