Sugo cacio e pepe vs Gran sugo cacio e pepe
Overall, Gran sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugo cacio e pepe | Gran sugo cacio e pepe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 217 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.4 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 17% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 217 kcal).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 20% less fat (16 g vs 20 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 26% less saturated fat (10.4 g vs 14 g).
- Gran sugo cacio e pepe has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
- Gran sugo cacio e pepe has 26% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Gran sugo cacio e pepe has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sugo cacio e pepe
Not available.
Gran sugo cacio e pepe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugo cacio e pepe or Gran sugo cacio e pepe?
Overall, Gran sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 217 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gran sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.