Sugo cacio e pepe vs Sugo cacio e pepe
Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugo cacio e pepe | Sugo cacio e pepe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 265 kcal | 180 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.3 g | 10.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 32% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 265 kcal).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 30% less fat (16 g vs 23 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 30% less saturated fat (7.3 g vs 10.4 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has 35% more protein (9.2 g vs 6 g).
- Sugo cacio e pepe has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sugo cacio e pepe
Not available.
Sugo cacio e pepe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugo cacio e pepe or Sugo cacio e pepe?
Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 265 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.