Comparison

Sugo cacio e pepe vs Sugo cacio e pepe

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSugo cacio e pepeSugo cacio e pepe
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — —
Calories 265 kcal 180 kcal
Fat 23 g 16 g
Saturated fat 7.3 g 10.4 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2 g
Salt 1.7 g 1.8 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 9.2 g 6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 32% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 265 kcal).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 30% less fat (16 g vs 23 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 30% less saturated fat (7.3 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 35% more protein (9.2 g vs 6 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

Sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sugo cacio e pepe or Sugo cacio e pepe?

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 265 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons