Comparison

Sugo cacio e pepe vs Sugo cacio e pepe

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSugo cacio e pepeSugo cacio e pepe
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — —
Calories 265 kcal 254 kcal
Fat 23 g 15 g
Saturated fat 7.3 g 9.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.7 g 2.4 g
Protein 9.2 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 35% less fat (15 g vs 23 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 26% less saturated fat (7.3 g vs 9.8 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 29% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has 56% more protein (21 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Sugo cacio e pepe has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

Sugo cacio e pepe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sugo cacio e pepe or Sugo cacio e pepe?

Overall, Sugo cacio e pepe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sugo cacio e pepe has fewer calories: 254 kcal versus 265 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo cacio e pepe has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons