Sugarly vs Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugarly | Edulcorante de Mesa a Base d... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 12.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 8.3 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugarly has no calories, while Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 29 kcal.
- Sugarly has no salt, while Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 12.8 g.
- Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 100% more fiber (8.3 g vs 0 g).
- Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sugarly
Agent de charge : erythritol, édulcorant : sucralose (0.22%).
Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina
Edulcorantes (ciclamato sódico E-952 (61.5%) y sacarina sódica E-954 (8.8%)), gasificante (bicarbonato sódico E-500ii), estabilizantes celulosa microcristalina E-460i y CMC entrelazada E-468) y soporte (L-Leucina E-641).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugarly or Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugarly has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugarly has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.