Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina vs Ciclamato y sacarina
Overall, Ciclamato y sacarina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina
Ciclamato y sacarina
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edulcorante de Mesa a Base d... | Ciclamato y sacarina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 12.8 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 8.3 g | — |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 8 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ciclamato y sacarina has no calories, while Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 29 kcal.
- Ciclamato y sacarina has 77% less salt (3 g vs 12.8 g).
- Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina
Edulcorantes (ciclamato sódico E-952 (61.5%) y sacarina sódica E-954 (8.8%)), gasificante (bicarbonato sódico E-500ii), estabilizantes celulosa microcristalina E-460i y CMC entrelazada E-468) y soporte (L-Leucina E-641).
Ciclamato y sacarina
Agua, edulcorantes (ciclamato sódico E952, sacarina sódica E954 1,6%), acidulante (ácido cítrico E330), conservador (sorbato potásico E202),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina or Ciclamato y sacarina?
Overall, Ciclamato y sacarina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ciclamato y sacarina has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.