Comparison

Sucralose vs Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina

Overall, Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSucraloseEdulcorante de Mesa a Base d...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 362 kcal 29 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 90 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 12.8 g
Fiber 0 g 8.3 g
Protein 0 g 0.9 g
Additives18
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 92% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 362 kcal).
  • Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has no sugar, while Sucralose has 90 g.
  • Sucralose has 100% less salt (0 g vs 12.8 g).
  • Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 100% more fiber (8.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Sucralose

Dextrose, édulcorant : sucralose (1,44%),

Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina

Edulcorantes (ciclamato sódico E-952 (61.5%) y sacarina sódica E-954 (8.8%)), gasificante (bicarbonato sódico E-500ii), estabilizantes celulosa microcristalina E-460i y CMC entrelazada E-468) y soporte (L-Leucina E-641).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucralose or Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina?

Overall, Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has less sugar: 0 g versus 90 g per 100 g.

More comparisons