Comparison

Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina vs Eritritol y sucralosa

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEdulcorante de Mesa a Base d...Eritritol y sucralosa
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 29 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 12.8 g 0 g
Fiber 8.3 g 0 g
Protein 0.9 g 0 g
Additives82
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Eritritol y sucralosa has no calories, while Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 29 kcal.
  • Eritritol y sucralosa has no salt, while Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 12.8 g.
  • Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 100% more fiber (8.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina

Edulcorantes (ciclamato sódico E-952 (61.5%) y sacarina sódica E-954 (8.8%)), gasificante (bicarbonato sódico E-500ii), estabilizantes celulosa microcristalina E-460i y CMC entrelazada E-468) y soporte (L-Leucina E-641).

Eritritol y sucralosa

eritritol (99.5%), sucralosa (0.5%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina or Eritritol y sucralosa?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Eritritol y sucralosa has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Edulcorante de Mesa a Base de Ciclamato y Sacarina has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons