Sugarly vs Ciclamato y sacarina
Overall, Sugarly has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugarly | Ciclamato y sacarina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugarly has no salt, while Ciclamato y sacarina has 3 g.
Ingredients
Sugarly
Agent de charge : erythritol, édulcorant : sucralose (0.22%).
Ciclamato y sacarina
Agua, edulcorantes (ciclamato sódico E952, sacarina sódica E954 1,6%), acidulante (ácido cítrico E330), conservador (sorbato potásico E202),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugarly or Ciclamato y sacarina?
Overall, Sugarly has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugarly has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 0 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugarly has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.