Pure via 65 morceaux vs Ciclamato y sacarina
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pure via 65 morceaux | Ciclamato y sacarina |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 398 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ciclamato y sacarina has no calories, while Pure via 65 morceaux has 398 kcal.
- Pure via 65 morceaux has no salt, while Ciclamato y sacarina has 3 g.
Ingredients
Pure via 65 morceaux
agent de charge : érythritol, édulcorant : glycosides de stéviol (extraits de plante de stevia), arômes naturels, Une consommation excessive peut avoir des effets laxatifs,
Ciclamato y sacarina
Agua, edulcorantes (ciclamato sódico E952, sacarina sódica E954 1,6%), acidulante (ácido cítrico E330), conservador (sorbato potásico E202),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pure via 65 morceaux or Ciclamato y sacarina?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ciclamato y sacarina has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 398 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pure via 65 morceaux has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.