Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G vs Sucre de coco
Overall, Sucre de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de fleur de coco en po... | Sucre de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 383 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 93 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de coco has no fat, while Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has 0.5 g.
- Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Sucre de coco has 35% more protein (2 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Sucre de fleur de coco*. *ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Sucre de coco
Sucre de coco
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G or Sucre de coco?
Overall, Sucre de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de coco has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has less sugar: 90 g versus 93 g per 100 g.