Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G vs Sucre de fleurs de coco
Overall, Sucre de fleurs de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Sucre de fleurs de coco
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de fleur de coco en po... | Sucre de fleurs de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 383 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 91 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de fleurs de coco has 50% more fiber (1 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Sucre de fleur de coco*. *ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Sucre de fleurs de coco
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G or Sucre de fleurs de coco?
Overall, Sucre de fleurs de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 384 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has less sugar: 90 g versus 91 g per 100 g.