Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio vs Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Overall, Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio | Sucre de fleur de coco en po... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 383 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 90 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio has 38% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
- Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has 54% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio
Sucre de fleur de coco non raffiné issu de l'agriculture biologique
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G
Sucre de fleur de coco*. *ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio or Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G?
Overall, Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre de fleur de coco en poudre tubo 250G has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre de Fleur de Coco Bio has less sugar: 90 g versus 90 g per 100 g.